Even after last year's service cuts and a 17 percent fare increase on 30-day MetroCards, the nation's largest mass transit system is still imperiled by chronic budget problems. A $500 million deficit is project for next year and in four years deficits will grow to $1.5 billion.
It's every-day New Yorkers that usually bear the burden of these budget gaps. Naturally, voters want to know: which candidate for governor will finally bring the MTA's finances under control?
Unfortunately, all they've heard from the Democratic and Republican candidates is outdated rhetoric. Cuomo has said he would roll back the mobility tax, a source of $1.5 billion in annual transit revenue, while Paladino has pledged to "take apart" the transit authority "piece by piece." But does anyone have a plan to put the MTA back together again?
Both Cuomo and Paladino have made reform of Albany the central message of their campaigns. When it comes to transit, Albany certainly needs reform, but it shouldn't come via baseball bat. And threatening to end the mobility tax tells voters that racking up political points matters more than making the tough choices necessary to save mass transit.
The last thing New York needs is a continuation of the policies that have led to the MTA's grim situation: starving the transit system of vital revenue and then blaming MTA executives and MTA employees for service cuts. The fact is, the governor and state legislature are most responsible for the MTA's finances.
Recently the state legislature has gone so far as to take $160 million in dedicated revenue from transit, a decision that led to last year's service cuts. For the sake of New York's economy, and for the 2.3 million New Yorkers that rely on mass transit every day to get to work, Albany's neglect of mass transit must end.
Real reform means making smart investments in the transit system that will drive economic growth, create good jobs, boost the state's competitiveness, and save taxpayers money in the long-term. Albany's mismanagement of MTA finances has saddled the authority with a $31 billion debt burden. This excessive borrowing comes at a cost. This year the MTA will pay $1.8 billion just for past borrowing, and this figure will grow to $2.7 billion a year by 2017.
Earlier this month, the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy and Transportation Alternatives released a five-step plan to help the next governor put the MTA on sound financial footing. One recommended step in the plan is fully embracing congestion pricing or bridge tolls to fund mass transit. After all, drivers greatly benefit from the congestion reduction that transit provides. Without transit, there would be 8.5 million more car trips on the region's roads every day.
Another recommended step for the next governor is to partner with New York's congressional delegation to secure more federal funding for transit. Transit is a top priority for the Obama administration and an important new transportation bill will be introduced next year. After vigorous campaigning by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles will receive a $540 million federal loan for transit. The next governor of New York should make a case in Washington for more federal funds for state transit projects. After all, the New York City metro region produces $1.2 trillion in economic activity every year. But there is no indication yet that the candidates would expend as much energy on transit as other national leaders.
Instead, there is a knee-jerk fixation on cost-cutting to solve the MTA's budget mess. It won't work. MTA chief Jay Walder has already found $700 million in annual savings through cost-cutting and other efficiencies and has plans to find more. But no amount of cost cutting will fill the $9 billion hole in the MTA's capital budget, or pay down the $31 billion in debt.
There will be no easy answers. But one thing is clear: The state's greatest revenue generator, New York City, depends on transit. And communities upstate will look for new transit options as gasoline gets more expensive. Other cities across the globe are ambitiously building transit systems with the intent of supplanting New York's dominance. The next governor cannot create a competitive twenty-first century transit system via cuts and quick fixes. Reinvestment is crucial.
John Petro is an urban policy analyst at the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy. Noah Budnick is deputy director at Transportation Alternatives.
Catelynn and Tyler
They’re shown living with their parents on the show, working part time jobs and struggling to pay for basic necessities, but the stars of MTV’s Teen Mom are not broke. Life & Style reports that they earn over $60,000 a year, which actually sounds pretty cheap of MTV considering how popular the show is. After so many of you suggested it, I’ve watched the first five episodes of the second season and I definitely get why so many of you watch this show. It’s kind of fascinating and you feel for these girls and their babies. Now that I know how much money they make I understand how Farrah affords that nice apartment despite complaining constantly about money. It also explains how these kids are able to go out to dinner all the time. Amber and Gary especially seem broke, but it sounds like they’re doing just fine.
Life & Style has learned that the stars of MTV’s hit show Teen Mom are raking in the dough!
“The Teen Mom stars earn $60,000 to $65,000 per season,” a series insider tells Life & Style. It’s enough to provide on-again, off-again couple Amber Portwood and Gary Shirley with comfortable lives — but neither one seems to be a good saver. “Gary says he’s broke,” Gary’s best friend, Jordan Sanchez, tells Life & Style. “The money is the only reason he’s willing to do the show. You can’t walk away from money like that.”
It’s true–in fact, Jordan tells Life & Style that Amber and Gary have already started filming the next season of Teen Mom in Tennessee. Lately, they’ve talked about moving to Florida, where Amber’s uncle owns a business.
[From Life & Style]
Like I said I’ve only seen a few episodes of this show, but this really makes me question how “real” it is. They present it like a kind of documentary and the kids are constantly worried about money and cutting corners to make ends meet. It just seems so false to me if they’re paid so well. Sure $60,000 isn’t a huge amount of money, but it’s good pay and it’s not like they’re living hand to mouth.
It’s easy to imagine Amber and Gary wasting their money because they’re just so trashy. Amber is so damn cruel and nasty and she can be hard to watch. Catelynn and Tyler, who gave up their baby for adoption, are good kids and are probably giving the money to their families. Jezebel is soliciting donations for a college fund for them and on the show it seems like they really need it. Their families look very poor. Maci comes from an upper middle class family and is very responsible, so I can see her managing her money well and continuing to work for her son’s sake. Farrah is somewhat of a dimwit and was shown getting victimized by an online scam in which someone wrote her a bad check and then had her wire them money in exchange for selling her car. (Her mom is a manipulative, abusive bitch though and she’s dealing with a lot.) Farrah’s bank told her that her account was overdrawn for nearly the full amount she wired, so what happened to her MTV paycheck? Does MTV make the stars save that money separately?
It’s good that MTV is paying these kids but then how do they justify showing them barely getting by? Are they putting the money in trust and making them live on whatever they make? I doubt it. Do only the women make $60,000 or do their partners pull in that money too? Producers have some explaining to do.
Maci
Gary and Amber
Farrah
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger
Even after last year's service cuts and a 17 percent fare increase on 30-day MetroCards, the nation's largest mass transit system is still imperiled by chronic budget problems. A $500 million deficit is project for next year and in four years deficits will grow to $1.5 billion.
It's every-day New Yorkers that usually bear the burden of these budget gaps. Naturally, voters want to know: which candidate for governor will finally bring the MTA's finances under control?
Unfortunately, all they've heard from the Democratic and Republican candidates is outdated rhetoric. Cuomo has said he would roll back the mobility tax, a source of $1.5 billion in annual transit revenue, while Paladino has pledged to "take apart" the transit authority "piece by piece." But does anyone have a plan to put the MTA back together again?
Both Cuomo and Paladino have made reform of Albany the central message of their campaigns. When it comes to transit, Albany certainly needs reform, but it shouldn't come via baseball bat. And threatening to end the mobility tax tells voters that racking up political points matters more than making the tough choices necessary to save mass transit.
The last thing New York needs is a continuation of the policies that have led to the MTA's grim situation: starving the transit system of vital revenue and then blaming MTA executives and MTA employees for service cuts. The fact is, the governor and state legislature are most responsible for the MTA's finances.
Recently the state legislature has gone so far as to take $160 million in dedicated revenue from transit, a decision that led to last year's service cuts. For the sake of New York's economy, and for the 2.3 million New Yorkers that rely on mass transit every day to get to work, Albany's neglect of mass transit must end.
Real reform means making smart investments in the transit system that will drive economic growth, create good jobs, boost the state's competitiveness, and save taxpayers money in the long-term. Albany's mismanagement of MTA finances has saddled the authority with a $31 billion debt burden. This excessive borrowing comes at a cost. This year the MTA will pay $1.8 billion just for past borrowing, and this figure will grow to $2.7 billion a year by 2017.
Earlier this month, the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy and Transportation Alternatives released a five-step plan to help the next governor put the MTA on sound financial footing. One recommended step in the plan is fully embracing congestion pricing or bridge tolls to fund mass transit. After all, drivers greatly benefit from the congestion reduction that transit provides. Without transit, there would be 8.5 million more car trips on the region's roads every day.
Another recommended step for the next governor is to partner with New York's congressional delegation to secure more federal funding for transit. Transit is a top priority for the Obama administration and an important new transportation bill will be introduced next year. After vigorous campaigning by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles will receive a $540 million federal loan for transit. The next governor of New York should make a case in Washington for more federal funds for state transit projects. After all, the New York City metro region produces $1.2 trillion in economic activity every year. But there is no indication yet that the candidates would expend as much energy on transit as other national leaders.
Instead, there is a knee-jerk fixation on cost-cutting to solve the MTA's budget mess. It won't work. MTA chief Jay Walder has already found $700 million in annual savings through cost-cutting and other efficiencies and has plans to find more. But no amount of cost cutting will fill the $9 billion hole in the MTA's capital budget, or pay down the $31 billion in debt.
There will be no easy answers. But one thing is clear: The state's greatest revenue generator, New York City, depends on transit. And communities upstate will look for new transit options as gasoline gets more expensive. Other cities across the globe are ambitiously building transit systems with the intent of supplanting New York's dominance. The next governor cannot create a competitive twenty-first century transit system via cuts and quick fixes. Reinvestment is crucial.
John Petro is an urban policy analyst at the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy. Noah Budnick is deputy director at Transportation Alternatives.
Catelynn and Tyler
They’re shown living with their parents on the show, working part time jobs and struggling to pay for basic necessities, but the stars of MTV’s Teen Mom are not broke. Life & Style reports that they earn over $60,000 a year, which actually sounds pretty cheap of MTV considering how popular the show is. After so many of you suggested it, I’ve watched the first five episodes of the second season and I definitely get why so many of you watch this show. It’s kind of fascinating and you feel for these girls and their babies. Now that I know how much money they make I understand how Farrah affords that nice apartment despite complaining constantly about money. It also explains how these kids are able to go out to dinner all the time. Amber and Gary especially seem broke, but it sounds like they’re doing just fine.
Life & Style has learned that the stars of MTV’s hit show Teen Mom are raking in the dough!
“The Teen Mom stars earn $60,000 to $65,000 per season,” a series insider tells Life & Style. It’s enough to provide on-again, off-again couple Amber Portwood and Gary Shirley with comfortable lives — but neither one seems to be a good saver. “Gary says he’s broke,” Gary’s best friend, Jordan Sanchez, tells Life & Style. “The money is the only reason he’s willing to do the show. You can’t walk away from money like that.”
It’s true–in fact, Jordan tells Life & Style that Amber and Gary have already started filming the next season of Teen Mom in Tennessee. Lately, they’ve talked about moving to Florida, where Amber’s uncle owns a business.
[From Life & Style]
Like I said I’ve only seen a few episodes of this show, but this really makes me question how “real” it is. They present it like a kind of documentary and the kids are constantly worried about money and cutting corners to make ends meet. It just seems so false to me if they’re paid so well. Sure $60,000 isn’t a huge amount of money, but it’s good pay and it’s not like they’re living hand to mouth.
It’s easy to imagine Amber and Gary wasting their money because they’re just so trashy. Amber is so damn cruel and nasty and she can be hard to watch. Catelynn and Tyler, who gave up their baby for adoption, are good kids and are probably giving the money to their families. Jezebel is soliciting donations for a college fund for them and on the show it seems like they really need it. Their families look very poor. Maci comes from an upper middle class family and is very responsible, so I can see her managing her money well and continuing to work for her son’s sake. Farrah is somewhat of a dimwit and was shown getting victimized by an online scam in which someone wrote her a bad check and then had her wire them money in exchange for selling her car. (Her mom is a manipulative, abusive bitch though and she’s dealing with a lot.) Farrah’s bank told her that her account was overdrawn for nearly the full amount she wired, so what happened to her MTV paycheck? Does MTV make the stars save that money separately?
It’s good that MTV is paying these kids but then how do they justify showing them barely getting by? Are they putting the money in trust and making them live on whatever they make? I doubt it. Do only the women make $60,000 or do their partners pull in that money too? Producers have some explaining to do.
Maci
Gary and Amber
Farrah
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger
Even after last year's service cuts and a 17 percent fare increase on 30-day MetroCards, the nation's largest mass transit system is still imperiled by chronic budget problems. A $500 million deficit is project for next year and in four years deficits will grow to $1.5 billion.
It's every-day New Yorkers that usually bear the burden of these budget gaps. Naturally, voters want to know: which candidate for governor will finally bring the MTA's finances under control?
Unfortunately, all they've heard from the Democratic and Republican candidates is outdated rhetoric. Cuomo has said he would roll back the mobility tax, a source of $1.5 billion in annual transit revenue, while Paladino has pledged to "take apart" the transit authority "piece by piece." But does anyone have a plan to put the MTA back together again?
Both Cuomo and Paladino have made reform of Albany the central message of their campaigns. When it comes to transit, Albany certainly needs reform, but it shouldn't come via baseball bat. And threatening to end the mobility tax tells voters that racking up political points matters more than making the tough choices necessary to save mass transit.
The last thing New York needs is a continuation of the policies that have led to the MTA's grim situation: starving the transit system of vital revenue and then blaming MTA executives and MTA employees for service cuts. The fact is, the governor and state legislature are most responsible for the MTA's finances.
Recently the state legislature has gone so far as to take $160 million in dedicated revenue from transit, a decision that led to last year's service cuts. For the sake of New York's economy, and for the 2.3 million New Yorkers that rely on mass transit every day to get to work, Albany's neglect of mass transit must end.
Real reform means making smart investments in the transit system that will drive economic growth, create good jobs, boost the state's competitiveness, and save taxpayers money in the long-term. Albany's mismanagement of MTA finances has saddled the authority with a $31 billion debt burden. This excessive borrowing comes at a cost. This year the MTA will pay $1.8 billion just for past borrowing, and this figure will grow to $2.7 billion a year by 2017.
Earlier this month, the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy and Transportation Alternatives released a five-step plan to help the next governor put the MTA on sound financial footing. One recommended step in the plan is fully embracing congestion pricing or bridge tolls to fund mass transit. After all, drivers greatly benefit from the congestion reduction that transit provides. Without transit, there would be 8.5 million more car trips on the region's roads every day.
Another recommended step for the next governor is to partner with New York's congressional delegation to secure more federal funding for transit. Transit is a top priority for the Obama administration and an important new transportation bill will be introduced next year. After vigorous campaigning by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles will receive a $540 million federal loan for transit. The next governor of New York should make a case in Washington for more federal funds for state transit projects. After all, the New York City metro region produces $1.2 trillion in economic activity every year. But there is no indication yet that the candidates would expend as much energy on transit as other national leaders.
Instead, there is a knee-jerk fixation on cost-cutting to solve the MTA's budget mess. It won't work. MTA chief Jay Walder has already found $700 million in annual savings through cost-cutting and other efficiencies and has plans to find more. But no amount of cost cutting will fill the $9 billion hole in the MTA's capital budget, or pay down the $31 billion in debt.
There will be no easy answers. But one thing is clear: The state's greatest revenue generator, New York City, depends on transit. And communities upstate will look for new transit options as gasoline gets more expensive. Other cities across the globe are ambitiously building transit systems with the intent of supplanting New York's dominance. The next governor cannot create a competitive twenty-first century transit system via cuts and quick fixes. Reinvestment is crucial.
John Petro is an urban policy analyst at the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy. Noah Budnick is deputy director at Transportation Alternatives.
Catelynn and Tyler
They’re shown living with their parents on the show, working part time jobs and struggling to pay for basic necessities, but the stars of MTV’s Teen Mom are not broke. Life & Style reports that they earn over $60,000 a year, which actually sounds pretty cheap of MTV considering how popular the show is. After so many of you suggested it, I’ve watched the first five episodes of the second season and I definitely get why so many of you watch this show. It’s kind of fascinating and you feel for these girls and their babies. Now that I know how much money they make I understand how Farrah affords that nice apartment despite complaining constantly about money. It also explains how these kids are able to go out to dinner all the time. Amber and Gary especially seem broke, but it sounds like they’re doing just fine.
Life & Style has learned that the stars of MTV’s hit show Teen Mom are raking in the dough!
“The Teen Mom stars earn $60,000 to $65,000 per season,” a series insider tells Life & Style. It’s enough to provide on-again, off-again couple Amber Portwood and Gary Shirley with comfortable lives — but neither one seems to be a good saver. “Gary says he’s broke,” Gary’s best friend, Jordan Sanchez, tells Life & Style. “The money is the only reason he’s willing to do the show. You can’t walk away from money like that.”
It’s true–in fact, Jordan tells Life & Style that Amber and Gary have already started filming the next season of Teen Mom in Tennessee. Lately, they’ve talked about moving to Florida, where Amber’s uncle owns a business.
[From Life & Style]
Like I said I’ve only seen a few episodes of this show, but this really makes me question how “real” it is. They present it like a kind of documentary and the kids are constantly worried about money and cutting corners to make ends meet. It just seems so false to me if they’re paid so well. Sure $60,000 isn’t a huge amount of money, but it’s good pay and it’s not like they’re living hand to mouth.
It’s easy to imagine Amber and Gary wasting their money because they’re just so trashy. Amber is so damn cruel and nasty and she can be hard to watch. Catelynn and Tyler, who gave up their baby for adoption, are good kids and are probably giving the money to their families. Jezebel is soliciting donations for a college fund for them and on the show it seems like they really need it. Their families look very poor. Maci comes from an upper middle class family and is very responsible, so I can see her managing her money well and continuing to work for her son’s sake. Farrah is somewhat of a dimwit and was shown getting victimized by an online scam in which someone wrote her a bad check and then had her wire them money in exchange for selling her car. (Her mom is a manipulative, abusive bitch though and she’s dealing with a lot.) Farrah’s bank told her that her account was overdrawn for nearly the full amount she wired, so what happened to her MTV paycheck? Does MTV make the stars save that money separately?
It’s good that MTV is paying these kids but then how do they justify showing them barely getting by? Are they putting the money in trust and making them live on whatever they make? I doubt it. Do only the women make $60,000 or do their partners pull in that money too? Producers have some explaining to do.
Maci
Gary and Amber
Farrah
eric seiger
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
big seminar 14
Google adsense is a good program for those who want to monetize their web site or blog. It is relatively easy to implement on your site or blog by simply installing a bit of code into the page. Google provides this code and it generates ads on your page according to the textyou already have in that page. For instance, if the text on yourpage is about the latest dog food scare from China, the google adsense ads will also be about dog food.
The first step is to get signed up for google adsense. Google makes this easy from their home page. Just click on "Advertising Programs" on the google hompage, follow from there, and you will be able to gather all the information needed to get started. As you get acquainted with customization of your google adsense ads, you will begin to wonder about colors and placement of the ads on your own page.
Its best to keep to a blended look of the ads with the color of your page. You probably are like me and do not really look to be "pitched" to when you are seeking information on the web. More than likely your readers are the same. If you can think like your readers, your google adsense ads will be more effective.
If you were to ask the so called "gurus" on the web your question of; "How do I make money with google adsense ? ", more than likely you will find some basic similarites in their answers. One answer would be; "Do not design your site around google adsense.". If you want to start a web site solely for putting google adsense ads on it and making money, there are plenty of people already doing that as you read this. Google designed their adsense program as an option to monetize your web site, not as a stand-alone money maker for a web site.
There are no hard rules against building a site around google adsense, but most people, including myself are much more likely to go somewhere else when a site is dominated by ads instead of useful information. Google has the last word, of course, as to who gets to use their adsense system.
What is a perfect site for google adsense ads ? One that is already getting moderate, targeted traffic on a popular category. What is a popular category ? "A.T. and T cell phones" is one. There are many others, and you will want to do your own search to see if your particular site is one that would have the high paying google adsense ads.
If you are a Webmaster, take the time to do a thorough search in your range of interests. More than likely you can optimize at least a few of your pages to coincide with those higher paying google adsense ads and drive some of your visitors to those pages. Yes, they will be leaving your site, but you will also be making money.
As a summary, money can definitely be made with google adsense, but the best way to do it is to look for related top-paying categories for your own existing site
or blog. That way you can stay focused, and it will be more likely that your readers will also become repeat visitors as well.
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger
<b>News</b> Corp to MySpace: Shape Up or Ship Out
We've been clear that MySpace is a problem. The current losses are not acceptable or sustainable. They must show improvement ...
Fox <b>News</b> On Christine O'Donnell - Mediate.com
The midterms are over, and while the GOP regained control of the House, the coronation of the Tea Party movement is still up for debate. Sure, a number of Tea Party candidates won their races, but perhaps the most visible -- Delaware ...
Colts <b>News</b>: NFL: <b>NEWS</b>
NFL: NEWS. The Colts talked through the off-season about improving the running game. During a recent three-game...(11.04). NFL: NFC NEWS - . NFL: AFC NEWS - � UpClose Online: 11/03/2010 � NFL 5K Run/Walk ...
eric seiger
No comments:
Post a Comment