Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Moms Making Money


12 Comments






  1. StunnaKway



    January 15th, 2011 at 8:01 am

    #TeamMinaj







  2. Kekeluvsu



    January 15th, 2011 at 8:08 am

    #teamdrizzy This should be great I like seeing his mom. You can see the love in his eyes and hear in his voice when he talks about her. GO DRAKE!!!!!







  3. maya



    January 15th, 2011 at 9:28 am

    aw, Drake is so sweet. I like the fact that he’s not all stuck up like most rappers :)







  4. DRB



    January 15th, 2011 at 10:08 am

    For me-


    Best New Artist: Florence


    Best Rap Solo: Eminem, then maybe Drake probably- IDK any of those are that strong and Kanye needs to fuck off.


    Best Rap Album: BP3 for me but probably Recovery or The Roots (which I’ve never listened to)


    Rap Duo/Group: On The Next for me, the Drake


    So…. hope he isn’t too disappointed if he doesn’t win anything. Eminem is going to shit on everyoe, then Jay’s runner up, then Drake fits in.







  5. A Realist



    January 15th, 2011 at 11:01 am

    Good luck Drake. I really hope he wins one!







  6. jhuntdaprodigy



    January 15th, 2011 at 11:39 am

    Drizzy should win best new artist, in my opinion. Forget Not Afraid though, best rap solo should be Power, if not Power, I’d be cool w/ Over though. Best rap album, idk rly, Eminem’s prolly winning that hands down. Rap duo/group should be Drake though for Fancy. On to the next one wasn’t that great 2 me.







  7. TRA



    January 15th, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    DRB, you sound like you hate Kanye. Kanye West is an egomaniac, and a loose cannon, but Kanye West always makes great music just as much as Drake. The only people who hate Kanye West are the media, and mainstream fans who never listen to any of his music. He might not be a very, good person but every album he has made has sold over a million copies to this point. His music is undeniable, 4 platinum albums, and a potential 5th platinum album says alot. I’m not just saying this because I’m a Kanye fan, but I am also a Drake fan, I say that Kanye and Drake are both at the top. Don’t just say fuck off without giving hardcore details to back up any venom you may have towards another artist.







  8. TRA



    January 15th, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    I want to see Drake win something, but if Drake loses, then Kanye West will be deserving since Power is a great song. I think Eminem is going to win a lot of awards for Recovery.







  9. Lolsmileyface



    January 15th, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    Aww nice :)

    He should win some of those that night, particularly the album and solo performance







  10. Heminem



    January 15th, 2011 at 7:08 pm

    Yay Drake!

    Respectful man.







  11. namzii



    January 16th, 2011 at 3:28 am

    hmm.. awh cute.. but he should have taken nicki ‘)







  12. Driz



    January 18th, 2011 at 3:33 pm

    I think he’s going to win the best rap/duo for Fancy and prolly the best new artist. Eminem will win the others..





Leave a Reply






Name




Email




















Life is anything but a beach for "Real Housewives of Atlanta" stars Nene and Greg Leakes.  Greg's 34-year-old son, Damian Leakes, is now spilling the beans about his stepmama and Greg.  And it ain't pretty.


 


Read on for the divorce details Nene doesn't want you to know...


Who needs enemies when you've got family like this?  Greg's son, Damian, and Nene's step-son, has been threatening to air out his parents' dirty laundry for a while now. 


Damian recently told Radar that Greg and Nene are on the verge of making their divorce happen, despite Nene telling press and media that reports of their split are untrue.  She claims they are just going through a rough patch but she has not moved on to another man and they are very much still together, even though we can't remember the last time we saw her wearing her wedding ring.


But it gets worse.  Damian says once Greg married Nene after meeting her at the gentlemen's club, he kicked all his kids out of the house!


"Once he met her he kicked us out of the house," Damian said, "the young siblings went to my mom's, and he just ran off to start a whole new life literally in front of our faces."


The kids have never been acknowledged on the show.  And now, Greg is demanding Nene to pay him back a whopping $300,000 he allegedly spent to make her a star-uh.  Not sure if that includes all the body sculpting she recently got done.


Damian says, "Nothing has been filed, but lawyers have been retained," Damian said.


"Gregg is also trying to get $300,000 back, but NeNe doesn't want to give him anything.


"She (NeNe) wants to keep the house and move on with her life. They're trying to portray it as 'we're not getting divorced' and they're trying to work it out right now, but that's not the case."


Damian said, "She wants to keep the house and move on with her life. They're trying to portray it as 'we're not getting divorced' and they're trying to work it out right now, but that's not the case."


And about where all the couple's so-called money came from: 


"That's pretty much what the kids are trying to figure out because we never knew that that kind of money was available or within reach to put into that kind of project," Damian said.


"At the time when the show started was when we all started really bumping heads with NeNe and Greg.


Damian claimed the hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on NeNe was used to portray "a lifestyle."


"You have to keep up with the Joneses, so to speak," Damian said.


On where all that money went:


"He [Gregg] feels like he put her where she is... he feels that she wouldn't be anywhere if he didn't give her the money to put her where she needs to be.


"He feels like he made her because he gave her a lifestyle everyone wanted to see. She feels like he should have supported her and had her back. NeNe does have a selfish quality and so does Gregg and eventually over time they're going to butt heads like what they're doing now.




"They're both stubborn. No one wants to give up anything. Everyone wants to say it's you're fault.


"My dad has always wanted to -- even if he didn't have it -- live the good life. And when they got together it was a monster being created. And this is what happens when the monster grows three heads.


We haven't verified this is his actual Twitter account yet, but it's looking like it is.  Here's what he said back in August when he was trying to sell this story to our homies over at Allhiphop:


 


@allhiphopcom got sum REAL dirt on my stepmom nene leakes. On my dad greg too. Tried 2 spare em but fuck it

This greg son. Tired of da leakes name being dogged out. We bout to expose greg AND nene. Stay tuned


8:12 PM Aug 24th, 2010 via mobile web .There are ALOT of secrets! This is Greg leakes son. The REAL leakes family is tired of the b.s.! Time to expose the TRUTH!



Wow.  Let the Splitsville drama continue...


Source



bench craft company

Fox <b>News</b> Calls Bulletstorm the Worst Videogame in the World

Fox News pundit claims that "increase in rapes" is due largely to videogames.

EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb PlayStation 3 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our PlayStation 3 news of EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb.

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro <b>...</b>

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro pricing: CP+ 2011: In addition to its latest lens announcements, Sigma has announced the price and availability of its 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM and Macro 150mm F2.8 EX ...


bench craft company

12 Comments






  1. StunnaKway



    January 15th, 2011 at 8:01 am

    #TeamMinaj







  2. Kekeluvsu



    January 15th, 2011 at 8:08 am

    #teamdrizzy This should be great I like seeing his mom. You can see the love in his eyes and hear in his voice when he talks about her. GO DRAKE!!!!!







  3. maya



    January 15th, 2011 at 9:28 am

    aw, Drake is so sweet. I like the fact that he’s not all stuck up like most rappers :)







  4. DRB



    January 15th, 2011 at 10:08 am

    For me-


    Best New Artist: Florence


    Best Rap Solo: Eminem, then maybe Drake probably- IDK any of those are that strong and Kanye needs to fuck off.


    Best Rap Album: BP3 for me but probably Recovery or The Roots (which I’ve never listened to)


    Rap Duo/Group: On The Next for me, the Drake


    So…. hope he isn’t too disappointed if he doesn’t win anything. Eminem is going to shit on everyoe, then Jay’s runner up, then Drake fits in.







  5. A Realist



    January 15th, 2011 at 11:01 am

    Good luck Drake. I really hope he wins one!







  6. jhuntdaprodigy



    January 15th, 2011 at 11:39 am

    Drizzy should win best new artist, in my opinion. Forget Not Afraid though, best rap solo should be Power, if not Power, I’d be cool w/ Over though. Best rap album, idk rly, Eminem’s prolly winning that hands down. Rap duo/group should be Drake though for Fancy. On to the next one wasn’t that great 2 me.







  7. TRA



    January 15th, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    DRB, you sound like you hate Kanye. Kanye West is an egomaniac, and a loose cannon, but Kanye West always makes great music just as much as Drake. The only people who hate Kanye West are the media, and mainstream fans who never listen to any of his music. He might not be a very, good person but every album he has made has sold over a million copies to this point. His music is undeniable, 4 platinum albums, and a potential 5th platinum album says alot. I’m not just saying this because I’m a Kanye fan, but I am also a Drake fan, I say that Kanye and Drake are both at the top. Don’t just say fuck off without giving hardcore details to back up any venom you may have towards another artist.







  8. TRA



    January 15th, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    I want to see Drake win something, but if Drake loses, then Kanye West will be deserving since Power is a great song. I think Eminem is going to win a lot of awards for Recovery.







  9. Lolsmileyface



    January 15th, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    Aww nice :)

    He should win some of those that night, particularly the album and solo performance







  10. Heminem



    January 15th, 2011 at 7:08 pm

    Yay Drake!

    Respectful man.







  11. namzii



    January 16th, 2011 at 3:28 am

    hmm.. awh cute.. but he should have taken nicki ‘)







  12. Driz



    January 18th, 2011 at 3:33 pm

    I think he’s going to win the best rap/duo for Fancy and prolly the best new artist. Eminem will win the others..





Leave a Reply






Name




Email




















Life is anything but a beach for "Real Housewives of Atlanta" stars Nene and Greg Leakes.  Greg's 34-year-old son, Damian Leakes, is now spilling the beans about his stepmama and Greg.  And it ain't pretty.


 


Read on for the divorce details Nene doesn't want you to know...


Who needs enemies when you've got family like this?  Greg's son, Damian, and Nene's step-son, has been threatening to air out his parents' dirty laundry for a while now. 


Damian recently told Radar that Greg and Nene are on the verge of making their divorce happen, despite Nene telling press and media that reports of their split are untrue.  She claims they are just going through a rough patch but she has not moved on to another man and they are very much still together, even though we can't remember the last time we saw her wearing her wedding ring.


But it gets worse.  Damian says once Greg married Nene after meeting her at the gentlemen's club, he kicked all his kids out of the house!


"Once he met her he kicked us out of the house," Damian said, "the young siblings went to my mom's, and he just ran off to start a whole new life literally in front of our faces."


The kids have never been acknowledged on the show.  And now, Greg is demanding Nene to pay him back a whopping $300,000 he allegedly spent to make her a star-uh.  Not sure if that includes all the body sculpting she recently got done.


Damian says, "Nothing has been filed, but lawyers have been retained," Damian said.


"Gregg is also trying to get $300,000 back, but NeNe doesn't want to give him anything.


"She (NeNe) wants to keep the house and move on with her life. They're trying to portray it as 'we're not getting divorced' and they're trying to work it out right now, but that's not the case."


Damian said, "She wants to keep the house and move on with her life. They're trying to portray it as 'we're not getting divorced' and they're trying to work it out right now, but that's not the case."


And about where all the couple's so-called money came from: 


"That's pretty much what the kids are trying to figure out because we never knew that that kind of money was available or within reach to put into that kind of project," Damian said.


"At the time when the show started was when we all started really bumping heads with NeNe and Greg.


Damian claimed the hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on NeNe was used to portray "a lifestyle."


"You have to keep up with the Joneses, so to speak," Damian said.


On where all that money went:


"He [Gregg] feels like he put her where she is... he feels that she wouldn't be anywhere if he didn't give her the money to put her where she needs to be.


"He feels like he made her because he gave her a lifestyle everyone wanted to see. She feels like he should have supported her and had her back. NeNe does have a selfish quality and so does Gregg and eventually over time they're going to butt heads like what they're doing now.




"They're both stubborn. No one wants to give up anything. Everyone wants to say it's you're fault.


"My dad has always wanted to -- even if he didn't have it -- live the good life. And when they got together it was a monster being created. And this is what happens when the monster grows three heads.


We haven't verified this is his actual Twitter account yet, but it's looking like it is.  Here's what he said back in August when he was trying to sell this story to our homies over at Allhiphop:


 


@allhiphopcom got sum REAL dirt on my stepmom nene leakes. On my dad greg too. Tried 2 spare em but fuck it

This greg son. Tired of da leakes name being dogged out. We bout to expose greg AND nene. Stay tuned


8:12 PM Aug 24th, 2010 via mobile web .There are ALOT of secrets! This is Greg leakes son. The REAL leakes family is tired of the b.s.! Time to expose the TRUTH!



Wow.  Let the Splitsville drama continue...


Source



bench craft company>

Fox <b>News</b> Calls Bulletstorm the Worst Videogame in the World

Fox News pundit claims that "increase in rapes" is due largely to videogames.

EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb PlayStation 3 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our PlayStation 3 news of EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb.

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro <b>...</b>

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro pricing: CP+ 2011: In addition to its latest lens announcements, Sigma has announced the price and availability of its 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM and Macro 150mm F2.8 EX ...


bench craft company
[reefeed]
bench craft company

Making Money by cinaferoholbeck


bench craft company

Fox <b>News</b> Calls Bulletstorm the Worst Videogame in the World

Fox News pundit claims that "increase in rapes" is due largely to videogames.

EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb PlayStation 3 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our PlayStation 3 news of EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb.

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro <b>...</b>

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro pricing: CP+ 2011: In addition to its latest lens announcements, Sigma has announced the price and availability of its 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM and Macro 150mm F2.8 EX ...


bench craft company

12 Comments






  1. StunnaKway



    January 15th, 2011 at 8:01 am

    #TeamMinaj







  2. Kekeluvsu



    January 15th, 2011 at 8:08 am

    #teamdrizzy This should be great I like seeing his mom. You can see the love in his eyes and hear in his voice when he talks about her. GO DRAKE!!!!!







  3. maya



    January 15th, 2011 at 9:28 am

    aw, Drake is so sweet. I like the fact that he’s not all stuck up like most rappers :)







  4. DRB



    January 15th, 2011 at 10:08 am

    For me-


    Best New Artist: Florence


    Best Rap Solo: Eminem, then maybe Drake probably- IDK any of those are that strong and Kanye needs to fuck off.


    Best Rap Album: BP3 for me but probably Recovery or The Roots (which I’ve never listened to)


    Rap Duo/Group: On The Next for me, the Drake


    So…. hope he isn’t too disappointed if he doesn’t win anything. Eminem is going to shit on everyoe, then Jay’s runner up, then Drake fits in.







  5. A Realist



    January 15th, 2011 at 11:01 am

    Good luck Drake. I really hope he wins one!







  6. jhuntdaprodigy



    January 15th, 2011 at 11:39 am

    Drizzy should win best new artist, in my opinion. Forget Not Afraid though, best rap solo should be Power, if not Power, I’d be cool w/ Over though. Best rap album, idk rly, Eminem’s prolly winning that hands down. Rap duo/group should be Drake though for Fancy. On to the next one wasn’t that great 2 me.







  7. TRA



    January 15th, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    DRB, you sound like you hate Kanye. Kanye West is an egomaniac, and a loose cannon, but Kanye West always makes great music just as much as Drake. The only people who hate Kanye West are the media, and mainstream fans who never listen to any of his music. He might not be a very, good person but every album he has made has sold over a million copies to this point. His music is undeniable, 4 platinum albums, and a potential 5th platinum album says alot. I’m not just saying this because I’m a Kanye fan, but I am also a Drake fan, I say that Kanye and Drake are both at the top. Don’t just say fuck off without giving hardcore details to back up any venom you may have towards another artist.







  8. TRA



    January 15th, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    I want to see Drake win something, but if Drake loses, then Kanye West will be deserving since Power is a great song. I think Eminem is going to win a lot of awards for Recovery.







  9. Lolsmileyface



    January 15th, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    Aww nice :)

    He should win some of those that night, particularly the album and solo performance







  10. Heminem



    January 15th, 2011 at 7:08 pm

    Yay Drake!

    Respectful man.







  11. namzii



    January 16th, 2011 at 3:28 am

    hmm.. awh cute.. but he should have taken nicki ‘)







  12. Driz



    January 18th, 2011 at 3:33 pm

    I think he’s going to win the best rap/duo for Fancy and prolly the best new artist. Eminem will win the others..





Leave a Reply






Name




Email




















Life is anything but a beach for "Real Housewives of Atlanta" stars Nene and Greg Leakes.  Greg's 34-year-old son, Damian Leakes, is now spilling the beans about his stepmama and Greg.  And it ain't pretty.


 


Read on for the divorce details Nene doesn't want you to know...


Who needs enemies when you've got family like this?  Greg's son, Damian, and Nene's step-son, has been threatening to air out his parents' dirty laundry for a while now. 


Damian recently told Radar that Greg and Nene are on the verge of making their divorce happen, despite Nene telling press and media that reports of their split are untrue.  She claims they are just going through a rough patch but she has not moved on to another man and they are very much still together, even though we can't remember the last time we saw her wearing her wedding ring.


But it gets worse.  Damian says once Greg married Nene after meeting her at the gentlemen's club, he kicked all his kids out of the house!


"Once he met her he kicked us out of the house," Damian said, "the young siblings went to my mom's, and he just ran off to start a whole new life literally in front of our faces."


The kids have never been acknowledged on the show.  And now, Greg is demanding Nene to pay him back a whopping $300,000 he allegedly spent to make her a star-uh.  Not sure if that includes all the body sculpting she recently got done.


Damian says, "Nothing has been filed, but lawyers have been retained," Damian said.


"Gregg is also trying to get $300,000 back, but NeNe doesn't want to give him anything.


"She (NeNe) wants to keep the house and move on with her life. They're trying to portray it as 'we're not getting divorced' and they're trying to work it out right now, but that's not the case."


Damian said, "She wants to keep the house and move on with her life. They're trying to portray it as 'we're not getting divorced' and they're trying to work it out right now, but that's not the case."


And about where all the couple's so-called money came from: 


"That's pretty much what the kids are trying to figure out because we never knew that that kind of money was available or within reach to put into that kind of project," Damian said.


"At the time when the show started was when we all started really bumping heads with NeNe and Greg.


Damian claimed the hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on NeNe was used to portray "a lifestyle."


"You have to keep up with the Joneses, so to speak," Damian said.


On where all that money went:


"He [Gregg] feels like he put her where she is... he feels that she wouldn't be anywhere if he didn't give her the money to put her where she needs to be.


"He feels like he made her because he gave her a lifestyle everyone wanted to see. She feels like he should have supported her and had her back. NeNe does have a selfish quality and so does Gregg and eventually over time they're going to butt heads like what they're doing now.




"They're both stubborn. No one wants to give up anything. Everyone wants to say it's you're fault.


"My dad has always wanted to -- even if he didn't have it -- live the good life. And when they got together it was a monster being created. And this is what happens when the monster grows three heads.


We haven't verified this is his actual Twitter account yet, but it's looking like it is.  Here's what he said back in August when he was trying to sell this story to our homies over at Allhiphop:


 


@allhiphopcom got sum REAL dirt on my stepmom nene leakes. On my dad greg too. Tried 2 spare em but fuck it

This greg son. Tired of da leakes name being dogged out. We bout to expose greg AND nene. Stay tuned


8:12 PM Aug 24th, 2010 via mobile web .There are ALOT of secrets! This is Greg leakes son. The REAL leakes family is tired of the b.s.! Time to expose the TRUTH!



Wow.  Let the Splitsville drama continue...


Source



bench craft company

Making Money by cinaferoholbeck


bench craft company

Fox <b>News</b> Calls Bulletstorm the Worst Videogame in the World

Fox News pundit claims that "increase in rapes" is due largely to videogames.

EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb PlayStation 3 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our PlayStation 3 news of EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb.

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro <b>...</b>

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro pricing: CP+ 2011: In addition to its latest lens announcements, Sigma has announced the price and availability of its 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM and Macro 150mm F2.8 EX ...


bench craft company

Making Money by cinaferoholbeck


bench craft company

Fox <b>News</b> Calls Bulletstorm the Worst Videogame in the World

Fox News pundit claims that "increase in rapes" is due largely to videogames.

EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb PlayStation 3 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our PlayStation 3 news of EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb.

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro <b>...</b>

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro pricing: CP+ 2011: In addition to its latest lens announcements, Sigma has announced the price and availability of its 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM and Macro 150mm F2.8 EX ...


bench craft company

Fox <b>News</b> Calls Bulletstorm the Worst Videogame in the World

Fox News pundit claims that "increase in rapes" is due largely to videogames.

EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb PlayStation 3 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our PlayStation 3 news of EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb.

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro <b>...</b>

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro pricing: CP+ 2011: In addition to its latest lens announcements, Sigma has announced the price and availability of its 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM and Macro 150mm F2.8 EX ...


bench craft company

Fox <b>News</b> Calls Bulletstorm the Worst Videogame in the World

Fox News pundit claims that "increase in rapes" is due largely to videogames.

EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb PlayStation 3 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our PlayStation 3 news of EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb.

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro <b>...</b>

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro pricing: CP+ 2011: In addition to its latest lens announcements, Sigma has announced the price and availability of its 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM and Macro 150mm F2.8 EX ...


bench craft company bench craft company
bench craft company

Making Money by cinaferoholbeck


bench craft company
bench craft company

Fox <b>News</b> Calls Bulletstorm the Worst Videogame in the World

Fox News pundit claims that "increase in rapes" is due largely to videogames.

EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb PlayStation 3 <b>News</b> - Page 1 <b>...</b>

Read our PlayStation 3 news of EU PlayStation Store update 9th Feb.

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro <b>...</b>

Sigma announcements include 120-300mm F2.8 and 150mm F2.8 Macro pricing: CP+ 2011: In addition to its latest lens announcements, Sigma has announced the price and availability of its 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM and Macro 150mm F2.8 EX ...


bench craft company

Stay-At-Home-Mom statistics surprise CBS viewers! When it was reported on May 10, 2007 that fewer
women were returning to work after becoming mothers, eyebrows raised from coast to coast.

Why? The stats were on women who had chosen to give up "high-powered jobs" to become full-time,
stay-at-home moms.

"How can this be?" Americans wondered and puzzled. Giving up huge salaries in the "real world" to stay
at home? After all the well-earned degrees and struggle to compete in the corporate world? Are they crazy?

Wouldn't they miss all the stress of getting children ready for daycare? While trying to balance baby, baby
carrier, diaper bag, briefcase, handbag and nerves with just two hands?

Guess not. They have shed the suit, pumps and ripped pantyhose for the choice to be stay-at-home-moms.
Get used to it.

Some make the decision before the child is born. Others try to return to their glamorous world of high pressure
after their maternity leave is over. Then they see the light.

Some of the reasons women choose to be stay-at-home-moms

***extreme cost of quality daycare
***allowing child's formative years be defined by strangers
***emotional
***less stability for child
***even more stress to already stress-filled life

Sure, there are downsides

***loss of salary
***loss of mental stimulation
***less adult interaction
***having "unemployed" on resume

But the choice to be the one to nurture their child outweighs all the bad.

Then...when they finally get caught up on sleep and have less fatigue, they will have opportunity
to take care of their mental and emotional issues.

Many stay-at-home-moms look at finding a home based business when the child doesn't need
their on-call undivided attention as much.

Long ago hobbies may be dusted off and turned into a money making business...

***scrapbooking
***gift baskets
***crafts

There's also a long list of direct sales companies. The internet is a rich resource for finding
work-at-home opportunities.

Another idea that appeals to some stay-at-home-moms is taking the knowledge and expertise
they've acquired and writing eBooks. Also called consumer eBooks.

In this way, they are keeping abreast of the latest developments in their former professions
while mentally challenging themselves.

There's information-hungry people out there. These corporate stay-at-home-moms have the
goods to give the customer the information they need.

It doesn't hurt that this opportunity is one of the highest-paying home based businesses.
One that can even surpass their former salaries in the "real world".

Now who was wondering if these women had lost their minds?

(c) 2007 Karen Cook

When your child is ready to let you have more time for yourself and you'd like to look into
making money at home, drop over to http://ebookempire.blogspot.com


Karen Cook works in a Public Library where she researches information for parents everyday.





















































Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Free rental agreement forms doctor online


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


surface encounters

<b>News</b> Desk: Tim Armstrong&#39;s Hail Mary Pass : The New Yorker

He boldly threw about a hundred and twenty million dollars per year at Patch, an attempt to create hyper-local online news sites, which I describe in my piece on Armstrong that ran in the magazine last month. He hired more journalists ...

Olbermann to become “chief <b>news</b> officer” of Al Gore&#39;s cable <b>...</b>

Becoming chief news officer of Current TV is hardly a good trade for the prime-time position at MSNBC, and while some of his viewers will seek him out, most of them will probably stay put with Larry O'Donnell. ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: Marketing Your Online Business Like Arianna <b>...</b>

With the announcement today that online media giant AOL will buy the Huffington Post for $315 million from entrepreneur and founder Arianna Huffington, online.


Sunday, February 6, 2011

Making Money Internet


You're probably reading this on junk. And I'm not talking about newsprint - industry woes aside, that's high-quality stuff. But if you're on a computer or an iPad, and you're not plugged into an Internet jack in the wall? Junk, then.



But it's not your MacBook or your tablet that's so crummy. It's the spectrum it's using.



Spectrum, in the words of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, is the economy's "invisible infrastructure." It's the interstate system for information that travels wirelessly. It's how you get radio in your car, service on your cellphone and satellite to your television. It's also how you get WiFi.



But not all spectrum is created equal. "Beachfront spectrum" is like a well-paved road. Lots of information can travel long distances on it without losing much data. But not all spectrum is so valuable.



In 1985, there was a slice of spectrum that was too crummy for anyone to want. It was so weak that the radiation that microwaves emit could mess with it. So the government released it to the public. As long as whatever you were doing didn't interfere with what anyone else was doing, you could build on that spectrum. That's how we got garage-door openers and cordless phones. Because the information didn't have to travel far, the junk spectrum was good enough. Later on, that same section of junk spectrum became the home for WiFi - a crucial, multibillion-dollar industry. A platform for massive technological innovation. A huge increase in quality of life.



There's a lesson in that: Spectrum is really, really important. And not always in ways that we can predict in advance. Making sure that spectrum is used well is no less important than making sure our highways are used well: If the Beltway were reserved for horses, Washington would not be a very good place to do business.



But our spectrum is not being used well. It's the classic innovator's quandary: We made good decisions many years ago, but those good decisions created powerful incumbents, and in order to make good decisions now, we must somehow unseat the incumbents.

Today, much of the best spectrum is allocated to broadcast television. Decades ago, when 90 percent of Americans received their programming this way, that made sense. Today, when fewer than 10 percent of Americans do, it doesn't.



Meanwhile, mobile broadband is quite clearly the platform of the future - or at least the near future. But we don't have nearly enough spectrum allocated for its use. Unless that changes, the technology will be unable to progress, as more advanced uses will require more bandwidth, or it will have to be rationed, perhaps through extremely high prices that make sure most people can't use it.



The FCC could just yank the spectrum from the channels and hand it to the mobile industry. But it won't. It fears lawsuits and angry calls from lawmakers. And temperamentally, Genachowski himself is a consensus-builder rather than a steamroller.



Instead, the hope is that current owners of spectrum will give it up voluntarily. In exchange, they'd get big sacks of money. If a slice of spectrum is worth billions of dollars to Verizon but only a couple of million to a few aging TV stations - TV stations that have other ways to reach most of those customers - then there should be enough money in this transaction to leave everyone happy.



At least, that's some people's hope. Some advocates want that spectrum - or at least a substantial portion of it - left unlicensed. Rather than using telecom corporations such as Verizon to buy off the current owners of the spectrum, they'd like to see the federal government take some of that spectrum back and preserve it as a public resource for the sort of innovation we can't yet imagine and that the big corporations aren't likely to pioneer - the same as happened with WiFi. But as of yet, that's not the FCC's vision for this. Officials are more worried about the mobile broadband market. They argue (accurately) that they've already made more beachfront spectrum available for unlicensed uses. And although they don't say this clearly, auctioning spectrum to large corporations gives them the money to pay off the current owners. But even so, they can't do that.



"Imagine someone was given property on Fifth Avenue 50 years ago, but they don't use it and can't sell it," says Tim Wu, a law professor at Harvard and author of "The Master Switch." That's the situation that's arisen in the spectrum universe. It's not legal for the FCC to run auctions and hand over some of the proceeds to the old owners. That means the people sitting on the spectrum have little incentive to give it up. For that to change, the FCC needs Congress to pass a law empowering it to compensate current holders of spectrum with proceeds from the sale.



One way - the slightly demagogic way - to underscore the urgency here is to invoke China: Do you think it's letting its information infrastructure stagnate because it's a bureaucratic hassle to get the permits shifted? I rather doubt it.



Of course, we don't want the Chinese system. Democracy is worth some red tape. But if we're going to keep a good political system from becoming an economic handicap, there are going to be a lot of decisions like this one that need to be made. Decisions where we know what we need to do to move the economy forward, but where it's easier to do nothing because there are powerful interests attached to old habits. The problem with having a really good 20th century, as America did, is that you've built up a lot of infrastructure and made a lot of decisions that benefit the industries and innovators of the 20th century. But now we're in the 21st century, and junk won't cut it anymore.



You're probably reading this on junk. And I'm not talking about newsprint - industry woes aside, that's high-quality stuff. But if you're on a computer or an iPad, and you're not plugged into an Internet jack in the wall? Junk, then.



But it's not your MacBook or your tablet that's so crummy. It's the spectrum it's using.



Spectrum, in the words of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, is the economy's "invisible infrastructure." It's the interstate system for information that travels wirelessly. It's how you get radio in your car, service on your cellphone and satellite to your television. It's also how you get WiFi.



But not all spectrum is created equal. "Beachfront spectrum" is like a well-paved road. Lots of information can travel long distances on it without losing much data. But not all spectrum is so valuable.



In 1985, there was a slice of spectrum that was too crummy for anyone to want. It was so weak that the radiation that microwaves emit could mess with it. So the government released it to the public. As long as whatever you were doing didn't interfere with what anyone else was doing, you could build on that spectrum. That's how we got garage-door openers and cordless phones. Because the information didn't have to travel far, the junk spectrum was good enough. Later on, that same section of junk spectrum became the home for WiFi - a crucial, multibillion-dollar industry. A platform for massive technological innovation. A huge increase in quality of life.



There's a lesson in that: Spectrum is really, really important. And not always in ways that we can predict in advance. Making sure that spectrum is used well is no less important than making sure our highways are used well: If the Beltway were reserved for horses, Washington would not be a very good place to do business.



But our spectrum is not being used well. It's the classic innovator's quandary: We made good decisions many years ago, but those good decisions created powerful incumbents, and in order to make good decisions now, we must somehow unseat the incumbents.

Today, much of the best spectrum is allocated to broadcast television. Decades ago, when 90 percent of Americans received their programming this way, that made sense. Today, when fewer than 10 percent of Americans do, it doesn't.



Meanwhile, mobile broadband is quite clearly the platform of the future - or at least the near future. But we don't have nearly enough spectrum allocated for its use. Unless that changes, the technology will be unable to progress, as more advanced uses will require more bandwidth, or it will have to be rationed, perhaps through extremely high prices that make sure most people can't use it.



The FCC could just yank the spectrum from the channels and hand it to the mobile industry. But it won't. It fears lawsuits and angry calls from lawmakers. And temperamentally, Genachowski himself is a consensus-builder rather than a steamroller.



Instead, the hope is that current owners of spectrum will give it up voluntarily. In exchange, they'd get big sacks of money. If a slice of spectrum is worth billions of dollars to Verizon but only a couple of million to a few aging TV stations - TV stations that have other ways to reach most of those customers - then there should be enough money in this transaction to leave everyone happy.



At least, that's some people's hope. Some advocates want that spectrum - or at least a substantial portion of it - left unlicensed. Rather than using telecom corporations such as Verizon to buy off the current owners of the spectrum, they'd like to see the federal government take some of that spectrum back and preserve it as a public resource for the sort of innovation we can't yet imagine and that the big corporations aren't likely to pioneer - the same as happened with WiFi. But as of yet, that's not the FCC's vision for this. Officials are more worried about the mobile broadband market. They argue (accurately) that they've already made more beachfront spectrum available for unlicensed uses. And although they don't say this clearly, auctioning spectrum to large corporations gives them the money to pay off the current owners. But even so, they can't do that.



"Imagine someone was given property on Fifth Avenue 50 years ago, but they don't use it and can't sell it," says Tim Wu, a law professor at Harvard and author of "The Master Switch." That's the situation that's arisen in the spectrum universe. It's not legal for the FCC to run auctions and hand over some of the proceeds to the old owners. That means the people sitting on the spectrum have little incentive to give it up. For that to change, the FCC needs Congress to pass a law empowering it to compensate current holders of spectrum with proceeds from the sale.



One way - the slightly demagogic way - to underscore the urgency here is to invoke China: Do you think it's letting its information infrastructure stagnate because it's a bureaucratic hassle to get the permits shifted? I rather doubt it.



Of course, we don't want the Chinese system. Democracy is worth some red tape. But if we're going to keep a good political system from becoming an economic handicap, there are going to be a lot of decisions like this one that need to be made. Decisions where we know what we need to do to move the economy forward, but where it's easier to do nothing because there are powerful interests attached to old habits. The problem with having a really good 20th century, as America did, is that you've built up a lot of infrastructure and made a lot of decisions that benefit the industries and innovators of the 20th century. But now we're in the 21st century, and junk won't cut it anymore.



bench craft company reviews

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


benchcraft company portland or

You're probably reading this on junk. And I'm not talking about newsprint - industry woes aside, that's high-quality stuff. But if you're on a computer or an iPad, and you're not plugged into an Internet jack in the wall? Junk, then.



But it's not your MacBook or your tablet that's so crummy. It's the spectrum it's using.



Spectrum, in the words of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, is the economy's "invisible infrastructure." It's the interstate system for information that travels wirelessly. It's how you get radio in your car, service on your cellphone and satellite to your television. It's also how you get WiFi.



But not all spectrum is created equal. "Beachfront spectrum" is like a well-paved road. Lots of information can travel long distances on it without losing much data. But not all spectrum is so valuable.



In 1985, there was a slice of spectrum that was too crummy for anyone to want. It was so weak that the radiation that microwaves emit could mess with it. So the government released it to the public. As long as whatever you were doing didn't interfere with what anyone else was doing, you could build on that spectrum. That's how we got garage-door openers and cordless phones. Because the information didn't have to travel far, the junk spectrum was good enough. Later on, that same section of junk spectrum became the home for WiFi - a crucial, multibillion-dollar industry. A platform for massive technological innovation. A huge increase in quality of life.



There's a lesson in that: Spectrum is really, really important. And not always in ways that we can predict in advance. Making sure that spectrum is used well is no less important than making sure our highways are used well: If the Beltway were reserved for horses, Washington would not be a very good place to do business.



But our spectrum is not being used well. It's the classic innovator's quandary: We made good decisions many years ago, but those good decisions created powerful incumbents, and in order to make good decisions now, we must somehow unseat the incumbents.

Today, much of the best spectrum is allocated to broadcast television. Decades ago, when 90 percent of Americans received their programming this way, that made sense. Today, when fewer than 10 percent of Americans do, it doesn't.



Meanwhile, mobile broadband is quite clearly the platform of the future - or at least the near future. But we don't have nearly enough spectrum allocated for its use. Unless that changes, the technology will be unable to progress, as more advanced uses will require more bandwidth, or it will have to be rationed, perhaps through extremely high prices that make sure most people can't use it.



The FCC could just yank the spectrum from the channels and hand it to the mobile industry. But it won't. It fears lawsuits and angry calls from lawmakers. And temperamentally, Genachowski himself is a consensus-builder rather than a steamroller.



Instead, the hope is that current owners of spectrum will give it up voluntarily. In exchange, they'd get big sacks of money. If a slice of spectrum is worth billions of dollars to Verizon but only a couple of million to a few aging TV stations - TV stations that have other ways to reach most of those customers - then there should be enough money in this transaction to leave everyone happy.



At least, that's some people's hope. Some advocates want that spectrum - or at least a substantial portion of it - left unlicensed. Rather than using telecom corporations such as Verizon to buy off the current owners of the spectrum, they'd like to see the federal government take some of that spectrum back and preserve it as a public resource for the sort of innovation we can't yet imagine and that the big corporations aren't likely to pioneer - the same as happened with WiFi. But as of yet, that's not the FCC's vision for this. Officials are more worried about the mobile broadband market. They argue (accurately) that they've already made more beachfront spectrum available for unlicensed uses. And although they don't say this clearly, auctioning spectrum to large corporations gives them the money to pay off the current owners. But even so, they can't do that.



"Imagine someone was given property on Fifth Avenue 50 years ago, but they don't use it and can't sell it," says Tim Wu, a law professor at Harvard and author of "The Master Switch." That's the situation that's arisen in the spectrum universe. It's not legal for the FCC to run auctions and hand over some of the proceeds to the old owners. That means the people sitting on the spectrum have little incentive to give it up. For that to change, the FCC needs Congress to pass a law empowering it to compensate current holders of spectrum with proceeds from the sale.



One way - the slightly demagogic way - to underscore the urgency here is to invoke China: Do you think it's letting its information infrastructure stagnate because it's a bureaucratic hassle to get the permits shifted? I rather doubt it.



Of course, we don't want the Chinese system. Democracy is worth some red tape. But if we're going to keep a good political system from becoming an economic handicap, there are going to be a lot of decisions like this one that need to be made. Decisions where we know what we need to do to move the economy forward, but where it's easier to do nothing because there are powerful interests attached to old habits. The problem with having a really good 20th century, as America did, is that you've built up a lot of infrastructure and made a lot of decisions that benefit the industries and innovators of the 20th century. But now we're in the 21st century, and junk won't cut it anymore.



You're probably reading this on junk. And I'm not talking about newsprint - industry woes aside, that's high-quality stuff. But if you're on a computer or an iPad, and you're not plugged into an Internet jack in the wall? Junk, then.



But it's not your MacBook or your tablet that's so crummy. It's the spectrum it's using.



Spectrum, in the words of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, is the economy's "invisible infrastructure." It's the interstate system for information that travels wirelessly. It's how you get radio in your car, service on your cellphone and satellite to your television. It's also how you get WiFi.



But not all spectrum is created equal. "Beachfront spectrum" is like a well-paved road. Lots of information can travel long distances on it without losing much data. But not all spectrum is so valuable.



In 1985, there was a slice of spectrum that was too crummy for anyone to want. It was so weak that the radiation that microwaves emit could mess with it. So the government released it to the public. As long as whatever you were doing didn't interfere with what anyone else was doing, you could build on that spectrum. That's how we got garage-door openers and cordless phones. Because the information didn't have to travel far, the junk spectrum was good enough. Later on, that same section of junk spectrum became the home for WiFi - a crucial, multibillion-dollar industry. A platform for massive technological innovation. A huge increase in quality of life.



There's a lesson in that: Spectrum is really, really important. And not always in ways that we can predict in advance. Making sure that spectrum is used well is no less important than making sure our highways are used well: If the Beltway were reserved for horses, Washington would not be a very good place to do business.



But our spectrum is not being used well. It's the classic innovator's quandary: We made good decisions many years ago, but those good decisions created powerful incumbents, and in order to make good decisions now, we must somehow unseat the incumbents.

Today, much of the best spectrum is allocated to broadcast television. Decades ago, when 90 percent of Americans received their programming this way, that made sense. Today, when fewer than 10 percent of Americans do, it doesn't.



Meanwhile, mobile broadband is quite clearly the platform of the future - or at least the near future. But we don't have nearly enough spectrum allocated for its use. Unless that changes, the technology will be unable to progress, as more advanced uses will require more bandwidth, or it will have to be rationed, perhaps through extremely high prices that make sure most people can't use it.



The FCC could just yank the spectrum from the channels and hand it to the mobile industry. But it won't. It fears lawsuits and angry calls from lawmakers. And temperamentally, Genachowski himself is a consensus-builder rather than a steamroller.



Instead, the hope is that current owners of spectrum will give it up voluntarily. In exchange, they'd get big sacks of money. If a slice of spectrum is worth billions of dollars to Verizon but only a couple of million to a few aging TV stations - TV stations that have other ways to reach most of those customers - then there should be enough money in this transaction to leave everyone happy.



At least, that's some people's hope. Some advocates want that spectrum - or at least a substantial portion of it - left unlicensed. Rather than using telecom corporations such as Verizon to buy off the current owners of the spectrum, they'd like to see the federal government take some of that spectrum back and preserve it as a public resource for the sort of innovation we can't yet imagine and that the big corporations aren't likely to pioneer - the same as happened with WiFi. But as of yet, that's not the FCC's vision for this. Officials are more worried about the mobile broadband market. They argue (accurately) that they've already made more beachfront spectrum available for unlicensed uses. And although they don't say this clearly, auctioning spectrum to large corporations gives them the money to pay off the current owners. But even so, they can't do that.



"Imagine someone was given property on Fifth Avenue 50 years ago, but they don't use it and can't sell it," says Tim Wu, a law professor at Harvard and author of "The Master Switch." That's the situation that's arisen in the spectrum universe. It's not legal for the FCC to run auctions and hand over some of the proceeds to the old owners. That means the people sitting on the spectrum have little incentive to give it up. For that to change, the FCC needs Congress to pass a law empowering it to compensate current holders of spectrum with proceeds from the sale.



One way - the slightly demagogic way - to underscore the urgency here is to invoke China: Do you think it's letting its information infrastructure stagnate because it's a bureaucratic hassle to get the permits shifted? I rather doubt it.



Of course, we don't want the Chinese system. Democracy is worth some red tape. But if we're going to keep a good political system from becoming an economic handicap, there are going to be a lot of decisions like this one that need to be made. Decisions where we know what we need to do to move the economy forward, but where it's easier to do nothing because there are powerful interests attached to old habits. The problem with having a really good 20th century, as America did, is that you've built up a lot of infrastructure and made a lot of decisions that benefit the industries and innovators of the 20th century. But now we're in the 21st century, and junk won't cut it anymore.



benchcraft company portland or

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


bench craft company reviews
[reefeed]
bench craft company reviews

make money selling ebooks online and internet 134 by contactekobernie


benchcraft company portland or

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


benchcraft company scam

You're probably reading this on junk. And I'm not talking about newsprint - industry woes aside, that's high-quality stuff. But if you're on a computer or an iPad, and you're not plugged into an Internet jack in the wall? Junk, then.



But it's not your MacBook or your tablet that's so crummy. It's the spectrum it's using.



Spectrum, in the words of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, is the economy's "invisible infrastructure." It's the interstate system for information that travels wirelessly. It's how you get radio in your car, service on your cellphone and satellite to your television. It's also how you get WiFi.



But not all spectrum is created equal. "Beachfront spectrum" is like a well-paved road. Lots of information can travel long distances on it without losing much data. But not all spectrum is so valuable.



In 1985, there was a slice of spectrum that was too crummy for anyone to want. It was so weak that the radiation that microwaves emit could mess with it. So the government released it to the public. As long as whatever you were doing didn't interfere with what anyone else was doing, you could build on that spectrum. That's how we got garage-door openers and cordless phones. Because the information didn't have to travel far, the junk spectrum was good enough. Later on, that same section of junk spectrum became the home for WiFi - a crucial, multibillion-dollar industry. A platform for massive technological innovation. A huge increase in quality of life.



There's a lesson in that: Spectrum is really, really important. And not always in ways that we can predict in advance. Making sure that spectrum is used well is no less important than making sure our highways are used well: If the Beltway were reserved for horses, Washington would not be a very good place to do business.



But our spectrum is not being used well. It's the classic innovator's quandary: We made good decisions many years ago, but those good decisions created powerful incumbents, and in order to make good decisions now, we must somehow unseat the incumbents.

Today, much of the best spectrum is allocated to broadcast television. Decades ago, when 90 percent of Americans received their programming this way, that made sense. Today, when fewer than 10 percent of Americans do, it doesn't.



Meanwhile, mobile broadband is quite clearly the platform of the future - or at least the near future. But we don't have nearly enough spectrum allocated for its use. Unless that changes, the technology will be unable to progress, as more advanced uses will require more bandwidth, or it will have to be rationed, perhaps through extremely high prices that make sure most people can't use it.



The FCC could just yank the spectrum from the channels and hand it to the mobile industry. But it won't. It fears lawsuits and angry calls from lawmakers. And temperamentally, Genachowski himself is a consensus-builder rather than a steamroller.



Instead, the hope is that current owners of spectrum will give it up voluntarily. In exchange, they'd get big sacks of money. If a slice of spectrum is worth billions of dollars to Verizon but only a couple of million to a few aging TV stations - TV stations that have other ways to reach most of those customers - then there should be enough money in this transaction to leave everyone happy.



At least, that's some people's hope. Some advocates want that spectrum - or at least a substantial portion of it - left unlicensed. Rather than using telecom corporations such as Verizon to buy off the current owners of the spectrum, they'd like to see the federal government take some of that spectrum back and preserve it as a public resource for the sort of innovation we can't yet imagine and that the big corporations aren't likely to pioneer - the same as happened with WiFi. But as of yet, that's not the FCC's vision for this. Officials are more worried about the mobile broadband market. They argue (accurately) that they've already made more beachfront spectrum available for unlicensed uses. And although they don't say this clearly, auctioning spectrum to large corporations gives them the money to pay off the current owners. But even so, they can't do that.



"Imagine someone was given property on Fifth Avenue 50 years ago, but they don't use it and can't sell it," says Tim Wu, a law professor at Harvard and author of "The Master Switch." That's the situation that's arisen in the spectrum universe. It's not legal for the FCC to run auctions and hand over some of the proceeds to the old owners. That means the people sitting on the spectrum have little incentive to give it up. For that to change, the FCC needs Congress to pass a law empowering it to compensate current holders of spectrum with proceeds from the sale.



One way - the slightly demagogic way - to underscore the urgency here is to invoke China: Do you think it's letting its information infrastructure stagnate because it's a bureaucratic hassle to get the permits shifted? I rather doubt it.



Of course, we don't want the Chinese system. Democracy is worth some red tape. But if we're going to keep a good political system from becoming an economic handicap, there are going to be a lot of decisions like this one that need to be made. Decisions where we know what we need to do to move the economy forward, but where it's easier to do nothing because there are powerful interests attached to old habits. The problem with having a really good 20th century, as America did, is that you've built up a lot of infrastructure and made a lot of decisions that benefit the industries and innovators of the 20th century. But now we're in the 21st century, and junk won't cut it anymore.



You're probably reading this on junk. And I'm not talking about newsprint - industry woes aside, that's high-quality stuff. But if you're on a computer or an iPad, and you're not plugged into an Internet jack in the wall? Junk, then.



But it's not your MacBook or your tablet that's so crummy. It's the spectrum it's using.



Spectrum, in the words of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, is the economy's "invisible infrastructure." It's the interstate system for information that travels wirelessly. It's how you get radio in your car, service on your cellphone and satellite to your television. It's also how you get WiFi.



But not all spectrum is created equal. "Beachfront spectrum" is like a well-paved road. Lots of information can travel long distances on it without losing much data. But not all spectrum is so valuable.



In 1985, there was a slice of spectrum that was too crummy for anyone to want. It was so weak that the radiation that microwaves emit could mess with it. So the government released it to the public. As long as whatever you were doing didn't interfere with what anyone else was doing, you could build on that spectrum. That's how we got garage-door openers and cordless phones. Because the information didn't have to travel far, the junk spectrum was good enough. Later on, that same section of junk spectrum became the home for WiFi - a crucial, multibillion-dollar industry. A platform for massive technological innovation. A huge increase in quality of life.



There's a lesson in that: Spectrum is really, really important. And not always in ways that we can predict in advance. Making sure that spectrum is used well is no less important than making sure our highways are used well: If the Beltway were reserved for horses, Washington would not be a very good place to do business.



But our spectrum is not being used well. It's the classic innovator's quandary: We made good decisions many years ago, but those good decisions created powerful incumbents, and in order to make good decisions now, we must somehow unseat the incumbents.

Today, much of the best spectrum is allocated to broadcast television. Decades ago, when 90 percent of Americans received their programming this way, that made sense. Today, when fewer than 10 percent of Americans do, it doesn't.



Meanwhile, mobile broadband is quite clearly the platform of the future - or at least the near future. But we don't have nearly enough spectrum allocated for its use. Unless that changes, the technology will be unable to progress, as more advanced uses will require more bandwidth, or it will have to be rationed, perhaps through extremely high prices that make sure most people can't use it.



The FCC could just yank the spectrum from the channels and hand it to the mobile industry. But it won't. It fears lawsuits and angry calls from lawmakers. And temperamentally, Genachowski himself is a consensus-builder rather than a steamroller.



Instead, the hope is that current owners of spectrum will give it up voluntarily. In exchange, they'd get big sacks of money. If a slice of spectrum is worth billions of dollars to Verizon but only a couple of million to a few aging TV stations - TV stations that have other ways to reach most of those customers - then there should be enough money in this transaction to leave everyone happy.



At least, that's some people's hope. Some advocates want that spectrum - or at least a substantial portion of it - left unlicensed. Rather than using telecom corporations such as Verizon to buy off the current owners of the spectrum, they'd like to see the federal government take some of that spectrum back and preserve it as a public resource for the sort of innovation we can't yet imagine and that the big corporations aren't likely to pioneer - the same as happened with WiFi. But as of yet, that's not the FCC's vision for this. Officials are more worried about the mobile broadband market. They argue (accurately) that they've already made more beachfront spectrum available for unlicensed uses. And although they don't say this clearly, auctioning spectrum to large corporations gives them the money to pay off the current owners. But even so, they can't do that.



"Imagine someone was given property on Fifth Avenue 50 years ago, but they don't use it and can't sell it," says Tim Wu, a law professor at Harvard and author of "The Master Switch." That's the situation that's arisen in the spectrum universe. It's not legal for the FCC to run auctions and hand over some of the proceeds to the old owners. That means the people sitting on the spectrum have little incentive to give it up. For that to change, the FCC needs Congress to pass a law empowering it to compensate current holders of spectrum with proceeds from the sale.



One way - the slightly demagogic way - to underscore the urgency here is to invoke China: Do you think it's letting its information infrastructure stagnate because it's a bureaucratic hassle to get the permits shifted? I rather doubt it.



Of course, we don't want the Chinese system. Democracy is worth some red tape. But if we're going to keep a good political system from becoming an economic handicap, there are going to be a lot of decisions like this one that need to be made. Decisions where we know what we need to do to move the economy forward, but where it's easier to do nothing because there are powerful interests attached to old habits. The problem with having a really good 20th century, as America did, is that you've built up a lot of infrastructure and made a lot of decisions that benefit the industries and innovators of the 20th century. But now we're in the 21st century, and junk won't cut it anymore.



bench craft company reviews

make money selling ebooks online and internet 134 by contactekobernie


benchcraft company scam

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


benchcraft company portland or

make money selling ebooks online and internet 134 by contactekobernie


benchcraft company portland or

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


bench craft company reviews

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


bench craft company reviews

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


how to lose weight fast bench craft company reviews
benchcraft company portland or

make money selling ebooks online and internet 134 by contactekobernie


bench craft company reviews
benchcraft company scam

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


benchcraft company portland or

Social bookmarking sites are some of the most popular websites on the Internet. Because of this, social bookmarking sites are a great source of making money online. This article will cover some of the simplest methods for making money online using social bookmarking websites.

First of all it should be known that the amount of success, as with all make money online techniques, is directly proportional to the amount of time that you are willing to invest. Both building a strong social bookmarking profile, which is vital to getting the kind of traffic you want, as well as creating and submitting your content which you will monetize take a lot of time. If you are not willing to put forth a bit of effort you will never make a sizable income with this method.

Now the first thing that you need to do is create social bookmarking profiles, or sign up at social bookmarking websites. There are two approaches to this, sign up at 20-30 different social bookmarking sites and submit to all of these or sign up to 2-3 social bookmarking sites, make your profiles strong and submit on these. Both have their pros and cons; first of all having a powerful profile means that you will get many more votes, and thus views. Making a profile powerful at a social bookmarking website is time intensive, however, and not just at the start. You will need to continually submit new material (not just your stories but news from major websites, the more material the stronger you will become), vote, comment, and add friends. This is an ongoing project which limits you from time submitting to other social bookmarking sites and even from working on your own content. Making social bookmarking profiles at many different websites to submit your stories too has its benefits as well, however. You gain far more backlinks this way and rank well in Google. You still get a bit of social bookmarking traffic, just not as much. It is really a matter of preference here, both are great to get the traffic that you need.

Once you have picked out your social bookmarking promotion method all you have to do now is build your website for social bookmarking traffic. The thing to keep in mind here is that a classic sales page will not convert, and social bookmarking traffic does not tend to actually buy things that often. Because of this you will want to monetize your website in different ways, PPC or CPM (paid per impression) are all great as well as CPA (cost per action, where your user does not have to spend money). In addition, since each story is short lived and you want to be able to provide new ones often it is recommended that you use a blog.

Now that your site is up the next thing that you need to consider is the content. Not all content will interest people on social bookmarking sites, and thus, not all content will provide votes and traffic. Think about your target demographic here, these are teenagers or college aged kids. Most do not work. Most are very tech savvy. Niches that do well on social bookmarking sites involve humor, technology, entertainment and liberal politics. Build your blog around this to ensure maximum success.

Hopefully now you have learned how to make money online using social bookmarking sites. It takes a bit of effort but the traffic and earning potential is higher than anywhere else on the Internet.


big seminar 14

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


big seminar 14

Verizon asks employees to delay iPhone purchases | Apple - CNET <b>News</b>

Wireless carrier cites 'unprecedented' demand for the device in asking employees to postpone purchase plans, according to a memo obtained by AppleInsider. Read this blog post by Steven Musil on Apple.

<b>News</b> Corp. 2Q Earnings Double: Will Company Sell MySpace <b>...</b>

News Corp. more than doubled its earnings for the fiscal second quarter, the company announced Wednesday.

Be A Part of the Oscars Movie <b>News</b> &amp; Movie Reviews | Geo Blog

Do you like reading movie news and movie reviews? All of us without exception love the movies. They allow us to escape into a fantasy world and get away from our everyday realities if only for a while. Sitting in front of the screen at ...


big seminar 14




















































Wednesday, February 2, 2011

foreclosure help


Top Financial Services Committee Republican Says Foreclosure Prevention Efforts ‘Need To Stop’


Last month, Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL) — who has now officially been named the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee — explained that, in his view, “Washington and the regulators are there to serve the banks.” And it seems that the rest of the Republicans on the Financial Services Committee are coalescing around their chairman’s philosophy.


Last week, Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ), who is chairing the Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises, said that he wants to implement a mortgage finance system that is entirely private, jeopardizing the very existence of the 30-year mortgage on which so many families rely. And in a speech today, Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, said that he wants all foreclosure prevention efforts to be halted immediately:


“All these foreclosure mitigation initiatives we’re taking need to stop,” he said, speaking at an event co-hosted by the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business and the NYU Stern School of Business. Neugebauer said the private market should be allowed to work through the problems in the housing market without “administration pressure” to avoid foreclosures. “Markets aren’t kind, but they’re very efficient,” he said. “There were people who were put in their homes that probably never should have been there before.”


Neugebauer is parroting the conservative vision of the housing crisis — which to them was caused entirely by government policies encouraging homeownership amongst those who couldn’t afford it — so it’s not surprising that he thinks the government should get out of the foreclosure prevention business. But the actual problems in the housing market bear little resemblance to those Neugebauer outlined.


For one thing, leaving aside that many of the borrowers who faced foreclosure early in the housing crisis were hoodwinked by predatory lenders, the foreclosure crisis long ago migrated out of subprime loans and into prime loans, as people lost their jobs in the Great Recession. So a crisis created in large part by the shenanigans of bankers then walloped homeowners, who become unemployed through no fault of their own. Neugebauer’s prognosis also ignores the problem of underwater homeowners, who, again, through no fault of their own, now owe more on their mortgage than their home is currently worth, due to plunging home prices.


Meanwhile, one million homes were foreclosed upon last year, and real estate analysts say that another one million will go into foreclosure this year. This not only harms the individual borrowers, but the wider economy, dragging down home values for everyone else and blowing holes in bank balance sheets.


The administration’s foreclosure prevention efforts have, admittedly, left a lot to be desired, but that’s because they involve lots of carrots for banks to modify mortgages, but few sticks, while banks have institutionalized systems biased in favor of foreclosure (like their use of “robo-signers“). Neugebauer’s approach would simply remove the limited help current foreclosure prevention efforts provide, leaving homeowners to the mercy of the very banks whose negligence helped drive the housing crisis in the first place. For some ideas on how to properly reform foreclosure prevention programs, visit here, here, and here.




To assist in accurate compensation to consumers, and for targeting critical reasons that mortgage and foreclosure frauds flourish, it is imperative to look at the main tool: enablement from Judicial systems.


Congress must force courtroom judges to cease allowing courtrooms to be used by foreclosure mill lawyers, mortgage servicers, and lenders to commit fraud, and self-dealings that –RATHER than property returned to the lenders, enable lawyers or their straw buyer acquaintances to unlawfully acquire distressed property.


There are lawyers actually engaged in real estate racketeering through intentional fraudulent pleadings that they file in civil courts and bankruptcy courts on behalf of purported lender-clients –and some are filed via names of defunct mortgage companies.


For decades, it has been PROFITABLE, and FACILE to make use of judicial systems to accomplish multiple and various levels of foreclosure fraud, while also unlawfully rendering families homeless; and mortgage lenders and banks (that receive their mortgage-default insurance and IRS write-offs), never get the homes. Ultimately, after repeated flips, the homes become sold to Freddie Mac.


Lawyers who engage in willful foreclosure fraud also unconscionably access “deficiency judgments” against homeowners even though the reason for the deficiency is because their straw buyer friends place unlawful “credit bids.” And the lawyers record worthless property deeds after sham foreclosure auctions that impedes title insurance. The list goes on!


Also, aside from hoping, demanding that out-of-control judicial and political systems somehow right itself, American consumers need to DO our part. Pro-action accomplishes better results than (notwithstanding any justification) posting commiserating, blaming, or angry comments and statements on the Internet regarding our nation’s mortgage crisis. Ethical lawmakers, activists, news media –and particularly investigative reporters who put their safety on the line, are not solely responsible for exposing fraud and corruption.


Contained in the petition, “Request for Congressional Foreclosure Panel to Examine Foreclosure Lawyers” @ http://chn.ge/eU2zAm are details and illustrations about foreclosure frauds being carried out by some lawyers who file foreclosure proceedings in civil as well as bankruptcy courts. Individual consumers can help law enforcement to curtail and / or prosecute frauds associated with foreclosures by providing facts and information similar to descriptions in that petition. (It’s BETTER than copying / buying various publications via the Internet, and thinking one can take on court systems –in light of the few grounds for opposing foreclosures successfully.)


Anyone telling people to simply move out NEEDS a wake up call as to what’s really going on –including the cause of longterm blighted communities. Fraud foreclosed homes that ‘go back’ to lenders become put on the market and various channels and outcomes –always unlawful.


Hopefully people continue signing and sharing the petition, “Request for Congressional Foreclosure Panel to Examine Foreclosure Lawyers” @ http://chn.ge/eU2zAm, who file foreclosure proceedings in civil as well as bankruptcy courts. And hopefully consumers will heap upon offices of Attorneys General, information / evidence about foreclosure-judicial wrongdoing. *SEE: “Commentary on: “Emerging Battleground on Mortgage Abuses: Foreclosure Mills” @ http://t.co/riJXgou.



rock tops granite, rock tops granite scam, rock tops granite, rock tops granite scam, rock tops granite rip off, rock tops granite, rock tops granite rip off, rock tops granite scam, rock tops granite scam, rock tops granite scam, rock tops granite rip off, rock tops granite, rock tops granite scam, rock tops granite rip off, rock tops granite, rock tops granite horrible experience

Egypt crisis: Security force member killed; CNN iReporter helps <b>...</b>

Read full coverage of the unrest in Egypt updated continually by CNN reporters worldwide. Send your photos and video to iReport and see CNN in Arabic here. See also this strong roundup of timely, insightful views on the wave of upheaval ...

Bad <b>news</b>: Chuck Schumer snubbed by Snooki « Hot Air

Bad news: Chuck Schumer snubbed by Snooki. ... Bad news: Chuck Schumer snubbed by Snooki. Share. posted at 8:34 pm on February 1, 2011 by Allahpundit printer-friendly. To cleanse the palate, via WaPo and Vimeo poster “PAPSFIRST,” an ...

<b>News</b>.Me: Here&#39;s The NY Times&#39; Answer to The Daily

TechCrunch has an exclusive look at News.me, a new social news iPad app that keys you into what your friends are reading/linking to, while allowing you share the news you're reading as well. Will it compete with The Daily?